While competing brands like Apple or Oppo have moved to using the type of OLED displays that allow very granular dynamic refresh rates depending on the speed of your touch, Samsung only uses the screen technology that allows this for its high-end
, but without the touch-sensitive adjustments.
The case of the inferior Galaxy S23 series displays
For some reason, however, the maker of those same superior LTPO OLED displays – Samsung – only offers them on its highest end Galaxy S23 Ultra, and without the touch speed adaptation for added measure.
Samsung still lists a narrower 48Hz-120Hz refresh range in their 1080p display specs, they consume way more energy when lit up, and have much lower pixel density than what’s on the S23 Ultra. What gives?
Galaxy S23+ display cost analysis
If Samsung went with an LTPO OLED with absolutely the same characteristics for the Galaxy S23+, it would have added about 20% to the cost of the panel, raising the manufacturing expenditures for the phone in an industry with already razor thin margins for most phone makers but Apple.
Samsung Galaxy S23+ LTPS vs LTPO OLED display costs
For a few dollars more…
For $10 in production costs more, Samsung could have equipped it with a display to match the Galaxy S23 Ultra and made it a real flagship proposition in that regard to compensate for the lack of periscope zoom camera.