Asus Zenbook 14 OLED review: OLED on the cheap

As a reader, I sometimes get pretty far into a laptop review before I see the price. I’m not often surprised, though, because I’ve written enough reviews to have a sense of a laptop’s likely price range. But the newest Asus Zenbook 14 OLED threw me for a loop with its starting price of $700 for a device with a high-res OLED display on board.

That’s a phenomenal price when you get one of the best display technologies going. Yes, the entry-level configuration is relatively low-end, but for just $170 more, you can get higher-end components. That’s still an OLED-equipped machine with a solid build, good looks, and decent productivity performance for well under $1,000. Impressive.

Specs and configurations

A better-than-budget design

Minimalist designs have come to dominate laptops over the last several years. There’s just not a lot of bling on modern machines, and to my eyes, that’s a good thing. There’s no reason to embellish a laptop with a bunch of unnecessary accents. The Zenbook 14 OLED follows that philosophy with just a few accents to stand out. Its lines are sleek, its logos are subtle, and the only thing that truly sets the aesthetic apart is a rounded hinge that looks great from the side. Asus has pretty much abandoned the once-iconic concentric circles on the lid, and the Zenbook 14 OLED has a solid black chassis that looks great.

It’s also built fairly well, with an all-aluminum alloy chassis that resists flexing on the bottom and the keyboard deck. The display is a little bendable if you exert enough force, which makes it slightly less rigid than, say, the Dell XPS 13 Plus. But it’s also much less expensive, and indeed, it’s a quality build for the price.

The ZenBook 14 OLED’s display bezels aren’t the smallest around, but it still manages to be nicely sized. It’s just 0.67 inches thick and weighs a reasonable 3.06 pounds. It’s not the thinnest or lightest 14-inch laptop, but it remains quite portable.

You’ll love the keyboard, which has large keycaps and great key spacing. The switches are light and snappy, with maybe just a tiny bit of feedback separating them from the best Windows keyboards on Dell’s XPS line and HP’s Spectre machines. It also can’t match the absolute best, Apple’s Magic Keyboard on its latest MacBooks, but it’s not going to slow you down. The touchpad is large and has confident button clicks that are just a little loud. Asus incorporated its NumberPad 2.0 technology into the touchpad, which reveals an LED numeric keypad with the touch of a button. If you enter a lot of numbers, then you’ll appreciate it, and if you don’t, then it doesn’t get in the way. But it’s another nice feature to have at such an attractive price.

There are a lot of ports, with a mix of USB-C and more legacy connections like USB-A and HDMI. The microSD card reader is welcome, although a full-size reader is always preferable. And its wireless connectivity is up to date. Its one weakness is the lack of Thunderbolt 4, but that’s a limitation of the AMD chipset.

The webcam is 1080p and provides a quality image. The Zenbook 14 OLED doesn’t have an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello via facial recognition, but the fingerprint reader built into the power button works well.

Low-power CPU limited to productivity work

My review unit featured one of AMD’s low-power CPUs, the 6-core/12-thread Ryzen 5 7530U running at 15 watts and up to 4.5GHz. It’s the first laptop we’ve tested with this processor, and it compares well against the Intel Core i7-1355U, a 15-watt chip with 10 cores (two Performance at 5GHz and eight Efficient at 3.7GHz) and 12 threads. As usual, Intel’s single-core performance was better, while AMD’s multi-core prowess took the lead. The Zenbook also performed well against the Apple MacBook Air M2 in CPU-intensive benchmarks, although the MacBook was faster in creative benchmarks where the GPU is involved.

The Zenbook 14 OLED isn’t the speediest laptop around, but it will handle demanding productivity tasks. Its Radeon graphics scored particularly poorly in the 3DMark Time Spy test at just 1,221 (1,226 in performance mode), so it’s certainly not a gaming machine.

	Geekbench 5 (single / multi)	Handbrake (seconds)	Cinebench R23 (single / multi)	PCMark 10 Complete
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (Ryzen 5 7530U)	Bal: 1,457 / 7,527 Perf: 1,458 / 8,207	Bal: 123 Perf: 121	Bal: 1,457 / 7,527 Perf: 1,458 / 8,207	5,817
HP Dragonfly Pro (Ryzen 7 7736U)	Bal: 1,530 / 11,158 Perf: N/A	Bal: 84 Perf: N/A	Bal: 1,530 / 11,158 Perf: N/A	6,059
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i (Core i7-1355U)	Bal: 1,797 / 6,926 Perf: 1,804 / 7,815	Bal: 181 Perf: 118	Bal: 1,681 / 6,303 Perf: 1,758 / 7,576	5,514
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED 2023 (Core i7-1355U)	Bal: 1,829 / 6,893 Perf: 1,836 / 6,908	Bal: 157 Perf: 135	Bal: 1,629 / 6,005 Perf: 1,827 / 6,962	5,423
Lenovo Yoga 9i Gen 8 (Core i7-1360P)	Bal: 1,843 / 8,814 Perf: 1,835 / 10,008	Bal: 122 Perf: 101	Bal: 1,846 / 8,779 Perf: 1,906 / 9,849	6,102
Apple MacBook Air M2 (M2)	Bal: 1,925 / 8,973 Perf: N/A	Bal: 151 Perf: N/A	Bal: 1,600 / 7,938 Perf: N/A	N/A

Choosing a low-power CPU wouldn’t be a very smart choice if it didn’t offer great battery life. Fortunately, the Zenbook 14 OLED does just that. The large 75 watt-hour battery doesn’t hurt, I’m sure.

In our battery tests, the Zenbook did quite well against its low-power Intel alternatives. It couldn’t keep up with the class-leading longevity of the Apple Macbook Air M2, but it came closer than most. The much more expensive HP Dragonfly Pro with a low-power AMD Ryzen 7 CPU and IPS display also lasted longer in two of our tests.

The Zenbook 14 OLED is likely to last a full day of work as long as you don’t push things too hard.

An excellent, if not class-leading, OLED display

The Zenbook 14 OLED’s display looks excellent out of the box, with bright colors that aren’t oversaturated and the usual OLED inky blacks. That’s true of all OLED displays we’ve tested.

According to my colorimeter, the panel is very good, but it’s not the best OLED display we’ve tested. It’s bright enough at 369 nits, but the OLED display on the Acer Swift Go 14, for example, hit 523 nits. Colors were wide at 100% of sRGB, 96% of AdobeRGB, and 100% of DCI-P3, but accuracy was just good at a DeltaE of 1.44. Many OLED displays are under 1.0 (which is where the human eye can’t tell the difference). Finally, its contrast came in at 25,660:1, which is around average for an OLED display and thus vastly superior to IPS displays.

The isn’t just a great display for the money, it’s a great display, period. It will please productivity users, creators, and media consumers alike, the latter thanks to its VESA DisplayHDR 500-True Black high dynamic range (HDR) support. HDR content looks great, although not as great as the extremely bright mini-LED displays on Apple’s MacBook Pro machines.

There’s not much better for less than $1,000