Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED (2024) review: too little, too late

The Zenbook S 13 OLED is a classic 13-inch laptop design. It’s very thin at 0.46 inches at its thickest, comparable to the MacBook Air’s 0.44 inches and thinner than the XPS 13’s 0.58 inches. It’s also very light at 2.2 pounds, which is around a half-pound lighter than the Apple and Dell machines. Both metrics make the Zenbook S 13 OLED one of the thinnest and lightest laptops around.

The lightness is presumably afforded by the partial “plasma ceramic aluminum” construction that’s light, strong, and makes for an interesting look and feel on the lid. I’m not sure of the chassis material, but the Zenbook S 13 OLED feels solid in spite of it lacking the kind of dense feeling of the MacBook Air and the XPS 13. There’s no bending, flexing, or twisting anywhere, making for a very portable laptop that also feels very robust.

The aesthetic isn’t as much of a standout as with the MacBook Air (blockier and more elegantly designed) and XPS 13 (extremely modern when you open the lid). It’s a minimalist design in a dark gray with an even darker keyboard. The lid is the most attractive feature, in a gray that borders on black and with a shiny geometric pattern. The bezels aren’t as thin as on the XPS 13, especially on the bottom chin, and they’re plastic and not edge-to-edge glass. That’s the one design feature that, for me at least, always detracts from the premium look.

The Zenbook S 13 OLED has an excellent keyboard. It has large keycaps and is quite spacious, with a comfortable layout. The switches are snappy and precise, with enough travel to be comfortable and with a bottoming action that’s not at all fatiguing. I found the switches the tiniest bit too stiff, keeping Apple’s Magic Keyboard at the top for me. But most users will likely love the keyboard. I did like it better than the XPS 13’s zero-lattice keyboard that took me some time to get used to.

Asus incorporated its iconic keyboard angle that makes for a more comfortable experience. It also offers up some advantages in airflow and cooling.

The mechanical touchpad is very large, especially for a 13-inch laptop, and it has a precise feel and responsive buttons. My biggest problem with it is that the clicks are a bit loud and sharp. And I’m looking forward to the day when haptic touchpads are standard on premium laptops. The MacBook Air’s Force Touch haptic touchpad is much better, and while the XPS 13’s haptic touchpad has a learning curve because of its hidden nature, it’s still better once that learning curve passes.

The Zenbook S 13 OLED is the second laptop we’ve reviewed with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, a 15-watt chipset with 12 cores (two Performance, eight Efficient, and two Low Power Efficient) and 14 threads. It’s a significant step back from the more popular 28-watt Core Ultra 7 155H that has more cores and threads, but the slower chipset promises better efficiency.

The benefit of running with a 15-watt chipset is better efficiency. The Zenbook S 13 OLED has a 63 watt-hour battery, which is a good capacity for a 13-inch laptop and a bit more than the 55 watt-hours in the Dell XPS 13. But the Zenbook also has a high-res OLED display.

In our battery suite, it managed 8.75 hours in our web browsing test and 12.5 hours in our video looping test. In the Procyon Office Productivity battery test that’s a simulation of real-world work, it lasted for 13.5 hours. That’s a lot better than the XPS 13’s 7.25, 8.25, and 11.25 hours, respectively. It’s also competitive with other Intel Meteor Lake laptops.

The thing is, it’s still not great. The upcoming Windows on ARM laptops running Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite chipsets promise much longer battery life, and the MacBook Air 13 is also a lot longer-lasting. So, the performance drop from the lower-power chipset doesn’t pay sufficient dividends in battery life.

The Zenbook S 13 OLED has a 13.3-inch 16:10 OLED display running at 2.8K (2880 x 1800). Those are excellent specs that make for a sharp panel with dynamic colors and inky blacks. Its only downside compared to some competitors is its increasingly pedestrian 60Hz refresh rate.

According to my colorimeter, it’s an objectively excellent display. It’s more than bright enough at 391 nits, its colors are wide (100% sRGB, 97% AdobeRGB, and 100% DCI-P3) and accurate at a DeltaE of 1.12 (many OLED displays are less than the 1.0 mark that’s considered the gold standard), and its contrast is incredibly deep at 27,180:1.

It’s a spectacular display for every user, whether for productivity, creativity, or media consumption. It’s a much better display than the MacBook Air 13’s IPS panel, but the XPS 13’s OLED display is roughly equivalent although brighter at 482 nits.

The audio isn’t nearly as good. The two-speaker audio is just OK, with sufficient volume, clear mids and highs, and very little bass.