Galaxy S21 Ultra vs iPhone 12 Pro Max, Pixel 5, Note 20 Ultra: Portrait camera comparison

We may earn a commission if you make a purchase from the links on this page.

Today, we are comparing how all of these tackle portraits, an important camera feature that’s now a mainstay on flagships and mid-range phones alike. However, some do better than others thanks to depth sensors and software algorithms that cleverly blur the background of your shots.

Scene 1

Scene 2

It’s once again too hard to determine the ‘winner’ in this scene without zooming in a bit. Doing that reveals that the Pixel 5 probably shouldn’t be on your shortlist if you want to capture valuable family portraits. Meanwhile, the Note 20 Ultra and the S21 Ultra both show a general lack of fine details where it counts. The iPhone does a good job where the other fail to deliver.

When it comes to subject separation from the background, all phones in this scene show some artifacts. This can be attributed to both the complex background as well the individual strands of hair which are notoriously hard and probably downright impossible to be accurately devoid of blur. The iPhone and the Note 20 Ultra have both delivered the cleanest portraits as far as artifacts go, while the Pixel 5 has decided my 3-month-old son should be lacking the gift of opposing thumbs.

Here is another round of portraits that clearly shows Samsung’s tendency to produce overly-smooth selfies that aren’t very natural looking. Facial details only look good on the iPhone to me. The Pixel is possibly the worst offender in this scene: the noise and lack of fine details is especially jarring, and that can be easily seen in the 100% crops I’ve included below.

Another point I wish to tackle is the bokeh inconsistencies throughout some of the portraits. Take a look at the bench and the way its seat is separating the background. The Galaxies and the iPhone correctly deduce that the ground visible beneath the seat ins’t in the same dimensional plane as our lovely subject and apply bokeh. Again, the iPhone one looks the most natural to me as it gradually increases in strength. But take a look what the Pixel is doing here – incorrectly assuming that the ground and the subject are on the same plane leads to very abrupt and pretty jarring artifacts, with some spots blurred and others in tack sharp focus.

In the shadows, all phones do a pretty good job at lightening up the subject’s face in relation to the dim surroundings, which is generally desirable with phone-made portraits. Overall, the iPhone and the Galaxies have all done an excellent job here with great overall looks. The colors are true-to-life and the bokeh is on point. However, zooming in paints a familiar picture – total domination on the iPhone’s part, with the two Galaxies left behind with less details.

Just look at the insane amount of sharpness of the denim in the iPhone portrait, which can’t be matched by the portrait taken with no Android phone, despite having two to three times large file size. Impressive.

All four phones come at a disadvantage when it comes to portrait selfies since they all have a single front camera that’s not pretty good at depth perception. Thus, only software algorithms can be used to determine what should be in sharp focus and what parts of the background should be blurred. For the most part, all phones do a good job at that, though long hair and any additional accessories on your head are pretty likely to get slightly blurred. As evident in the photos above, that’s true with all phones so you should definitely keep it in mind when shooting portrait selfies. From a quality standpoint, the color rendition of each phone is what sets them apart: the two Galaxies go for a paler, not as lively look, while the iPhone and the Pixel have a character with more pronounced colors and contrast. There are artifacts here, of course, but that was to be expected.

Conclusion

So far, it still seems that it’s the iPhone’s world, and we’re just living in it.