Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2-in-1 Gen 9 review: a lacking screen

As usual, Lenovo’s pricing is both subject to change and sometimes confusing. Using the company’s configurator, the entry-level configuration runs $794 for an AMD Ryzen 5 8540HS chipset, 8GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 14.0-inch IPS display. The configurator shows a $999 price for a Ryzen 7 8840HS, 16GB of RAM, and a 1GB SSD.

The keyboard is very good, with Lenovo’s usual sculpted keycaps and plenty of key spacing. The switches are light and snappy, with just a bit of looseness that I found to be less than precise. This is one area where both the Spectre x360 14 and Yoga 9i Gen 9 were better, with a little extra firmness in their keyboards that made for an overall more comfortable feel. But even so, the Yoga 7 14 Gen 9’s keyboard is very good.

The mechanical touchpad is a different story. While it’s large enough, barely, and handles swiping and tapping just fine, the buttons are way too loud and harsh. The Inspiron 14 Plus’ mechanical touchpad was much better, and the Spectre x360 14’s haptic touchpad was one of the best on a Windows laptop.

The Yoga’s display is touch- and pen-enabled. My review unit didn’t come with a pen, so I couldn’t test it. But I expect that it will work as well as most Windows 2-in-1s for digital handwriting and drawing.

The Yoga 7 14 Gen 9 I reviewed uses AMD’s Ryzen 7 8840HS, an 8-core/16-thread chipset running at 28 watts. That competes with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, also a 28-watt chipset, but with 16 cores (six Performance, eight Efficient, and two Low Power Efficient) and 22 threads. Both are aimed at demanding productivity users, and both use integrated graphics that aren’t fast enough to power creative tasks or gaming.

In our benchmark suite, the Yoga 7 14 Gen 9 was reasonably fast, more so than the lower-power Intel U-series chipsets, but a step behind the Core Ultra 7 laptops I’ve reviewed. The differences aren’t major, though, making the Yoga 7 14 Gen 9 plenty fast for demanding productivity users.

Lenovo packed 71 watt-hours of battery into the Yoga 7 14 Gen 9, which is a good amount for a 14-inch laptop with an IPS display. AMD chipsets tend to be fairly efficient, and so I was expecting good enough battery life.

That’s what I got. The Yoga hit 10.5 hours in our web-browsing test, 12.25 hours in our video-looping test, and 12.75 hours in the Procyon Office Productivity battery benchmark. The latter is indicative of real-life performance running reasonable productivity tasks, and the Yoga did reasonably well. We just started using this test and so we don’t have many laptops to compare with. The web-browsing performance is better than most Intel Meteor Lake results and competitive with the U-series, while the video-looping test is just OK.

You’re unlikely to get a full day of work even doing lighter productivity tasks, but that’s what I’ve come to expect from most Windows laptops. The Yoga 7 14 Gen 9 isn’t a bad performer here. The upcoming Windows on Arm Copilot+ laptops, though, promise to be longer-lasting, but those will also be considerably more expensive and we haven’t yet confirmed that promise.

So far, everything’s been pretty impressive. The build quality, performance, and battery life have exceeded what I would have expected just a few years ago from a $699 laptop. But one area has always disappointed at the lower end: display quality. I was hoping for better here.

Unfortunately, I could tell this wasn’t a premium display when I first powered it on. The display was a bit lifeless, and that wasn’t just a factor of my reviewing so many laptops with OLED panels. Even compared to contemporary IPS displays, the Yoga’s 14.0-inch 16:10 Full HD+ (1920 x 1200) display wasn’t impressive. In particular, colors were muted and things weren’t as bright. Some laptops for under $1,000 have sharper panels.

When I used my colorimeter to test the display, I was surprised that the contrast was reasonably high at 1,210:1. There was a time when we set our standard for good displays at 1,000:1, but that’s no longer a valid benchmark. I haven’t tested a display in years that didn’t blow through that baseline. Brightness came in at 333 nits, which again is higher than our previous standard, 300 nits. We’ll need to revisit both of those metrics, because even lesser displays do better.

But the Yoga’s colors were just bad. They weren’t wide at 63% of sRGB, 48% of AdobeRGB, and 47% of DCI-P3. They also weren’t accurate at a Delta-E of 3.17. The Dell Inspiron 14 Plus is more expensive, but its IPS panel had 100% of sRGB, 79% of AdobeRGB, and 79% of DCI-P3 with excellent accuracy at a DeltaE of 0.8. And that’s the “worst” IPS panel I’ve reviewed in the last couple of years. The Asus Zenbook 14 Q425’s OLED display has wonderful colors and inky blacks, making it a better choice if you can find it for the same low price.

It’s easy to argue that Lenovo had to cut corners somewhere to be able to sell the Yoga at just $699. And maybe some other laptops in the same range will have similar displays. But it’s still a major compromise.

Audio is fine, with two upward-firing and two downward-firing speakers. There’s plenty of volume and mids and highs are clear, but there’s not a lot of bass. The audio is OK for YouTube videos and such, but a pair of headphones is probably a good thing for music and other content.

I liked the Yoga 7 14 Gen 9 quite a bit throughout most of this review. Its performance and battery life are fine for anyone with less money to spend, and in fact, the Yoga is faster and longer-lasting than many laptops that cost a lot more. It’s also well-built and has a very good keyboard.

The one weakness, poor display colors, might not matter to most productivity users. The display isn’t bad, exactly — it’s just not as good as some others. But overall, the Yoga 7 14 Gen 9 is relatively easy to recommend at $699. I just wouldn’t spend any more.

Editors’ Recommendations